Researching the Earth's magnetic field

Author: EmmaH

I am currently in my 2nd year of PhD at Liverpool. I completed a 4 year integrated masters, MGeol at University of Plymouth in 2010. My project title is ‘Further advances in determination of past geomagnetic field strength using synthetic samples, single crystals and basalt samples from the SW Pacific’ and is part of a larger project aimed at modelling data collected in the Southern hemisphere. My research area is in intensity of the past magnetic field and the methodology used to obtain it, luckily this has not constrained me to the laboratory as due to a dearth of data from the Southern hemisphere the project required some field work in New Zealand and Australia.

Magnetic Personalities – Analysing palaeointensity data

At the latest magnetic personalities meeting we looked at a paper by Ron Shaar and Lisa Tauxe named ‘Thellier GUI: An integrated tool for analysing palaeointensity data from Thellier type experiments’ published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. I chose this paper as it has direct relevance to the laboratory at Liverpool where we carry out much palaeointensity research.
As with many disciplines in science there is debate over the best methods of analysing data. Ideally there would be a format giving rise to objective results that could be reproducible and correlated between laboratories. Unfortunately this is not the case in the world of palaeointensity study. A plethora of Thellier style palaeointensity methods and analysis make it difficult to correlate across studies. The main issues highlighted by the authors are the subjective nature of manual palaeointensity analyses, that it is very time consuming and that unless the raw data is published the results are not reproducible.

The paper uses two case studies, one from an Iron Age copper slag and another of submarine basaltic glass from a DSDP/ODP cores spanning 160Ma to illustrate how manual interpretation leads to different conclusions dependent on which criteria are selected.

The Thellier GUI integrated tool for palaeointensity analysis is designed to isolate the criteria of most importance during analyses at the specimen and sample stages. It incorporates two new tools, the ‘Auto Interpreter’ and the ‘Thellier Consistency Test’. New statistics include FRAC, a fraction statistic and a new scatter statistic amalgamating all scatter including pTRM and tail checks called SCAT, and finally GAP-MAX an upper limit for the gap between data points in an Arai plot. Sample level palaeointensity values are then calculated using an optimised standard deviation statistic and simple and parametric bootstrap methods.

Snapshot of GUI main screen

Snapshot of GUI main screen

We unanimously agree there should be more uniformity in this field and hopefully this tool will go some way towards this. Uniformity of methods and analysis would greatly benefit our models of magnetic field behaviour where correlation of worldwide studies is paramount. We look forward to applying this approach to our own data sets. Work is also underway to integrate the Liverpool Palaeomagnetic Database with the MagIC database to encourage the standardisation of data format and consistency of analyses.

 

Shaar, R, & Tauxe, L. (2013), ‘Thellier GUI: An integrated tool for analyzing paleointensity data from Thellier-type experiments’, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 14, 3, pp. 677-692

Fieldwork in New Zealand

Yes, I know it’s a hard life but somebody has to do it……

Meet the team

   

Left to right, Dr. Gillian Turner and PhD student Annika Greve from Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand. Dr. Andreas Nilsson post doc and Emma Hodgson PhD student from University of Liverpool.

My PhD project ‘Further advances in determination of past geomagnetic field strength using synthetic samples, single crystals and basalt samples from the SW Pacific’ is part of a larger targeted palaeomagnetic study of the SW Pacific with Dr. Andreas Nilsson, post doc and supervisors Dr Mimi Hill and Dr. Andy Biggin  all at the University of Liverpool. We are lucky enough to be working with Dr. Gillian Turner and her PhD student Annika Greve at Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand who are also gathering Southern hemisphere palaeomagnetic data. They are looking to complete a palaeosecular variation curve (changes in the direction of the local geomagnetic field) for the last 10,000 years in the SW Pacific area this can then be used as a reference curve to help dating in the area. At Liverpool we look at the past intensity of the magnetic field, the methods used and modelling of the data. These projects are filling gaps in Southern hemisphere palaeomagnetic data which will in turn increase the resolution of the models and our understanding of magnetic field behaviour. A big thank you to Gillian and Annika for what must have been an awful lot of time and effort in planning.

 

On top of Red Crater looking down into Central Crater, the darker area on the left is the 1955 flow we sampled

In February this year we headed off to the Tongariro National Park, central North Island to collect rock cores from lava flows on the flanks of Mount Ruapehu and Tongariro. We stayed at Whakapapa village on the slopes of Mount Ruapehu, a campsite for visitors who come for the spectacular walks and skiing this area is famous for. It was an ideal location for access to Ruapehu, Tongariro and the imposing Ngauruhoe (Mount Doom to any Lord of the Rings fans).

Our biggest issues in collecting samples were identifying suitable dated lavas and accessibility.

Finding lava was not a problem but finding flows that had been dated was! The younger Holocene lavas (less than ~11,500 years old) we were collecting are notoriously difficult to date with the commonly used potassium-argon (K/Ar) radiometric dating method. So far it has only been possible to date these lava flows through bracketing by tephra (ash) layers from past eruptions with known ages. Fortunately a group of geochemists from Victoria University, Wellington, NZ were using a new method of K/Ar dating to date Holocene flows as part of a mapping project in the area. They identified flows they had already dated using this method and some they were in the process of dating.

We were aware there would be accessibility problems and a degree of hiking or ‘tramping’ as it’s known in New Zealand would be called for we weren’t disappointed! Most locations were remote and required a 2-3 hour tramp to reach the flow we wanted. Despite the effort of carrying pack, drill and sometimes large quantities of water (to cool the drill bit) the further we walked the more spectacular the views became. A five hour climb up onto the Tongariro plateau then over Red Crater into Central Crater with equipment and 20 litres of water between three of us certainly was one to remember. Accessibility was also hampered by the ongoing threat of eruption in the area the most recent from neighbouring Te Maari vents in Nov 2012.

The area was dominated by dense andesites andsome basalt which proved to be quite taxing for the rock drills which were custom made from chainsaws with diamond tip drill bit attachments. The cores were 2.5cm diameter and around 10cm long these can then be shortened to fit the various instruments used for their analyses. Orientating the cores in respect to north was done with a sun compass as most of these rocks were strongly magnetised and deflected the needle on a magnetic compass.

As we were in a National Park we had to be very conscious of our impact on the natural environment so efforts were made to conceal the holes made by the drill. A before and after picture of a drill site shows effort was made to reduce any impact.

 

All in all we had a very successful trip to New Zealand so now it’s back to the laboratory for the next few months where we will be carrying out rock magnetic investigations to ascertain the best methods to measure the palaeointensities. The results of the of this project and associated collaborations will lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the magnetic field behaviour over the last 10ka in the SW Pacific.

Gillian, Andreas, Annika and Emma having a bit of fun!

 

 

Project Links

Targeted Palaeomagnetic Study of the SW Pacific

http://pcwww.liv.ac.uk/~nilsson/index.html

 Welcome to our project website aimed at presenting and visualizing new palaeomagnetic research from 0-5Ma rocks and pottery from in and around the SW Pacific .

We are a research group based in the Geomagnetism laboratory, University of Liverpool with collaborators in New Zealand and Australia. The project will incorporate improved geomagnetic field models with data collected from the SW Pacific. At present most of the data comes from the Northern hemisphere and Hawaii, leaving a data deficit in the Southern hemisphere. Fieldwork in New Zealand will took place in February 2012, while other samples will be donated by collaborators.

In particular palaeointensity will be used in geomagnetic field models to better understand the deep Earth processes that create the magnetic field.

Unlocking the Secrets of the Geodynamo – the South West Pacific Key 

http://www.victoria.ac.nz/scps/research/research-groups/enviro-phys-geo/geomagnetism/projects

 

 

Magnetic Personalities

An important part of being a part of the palaeomagnetic community is keeping abreast of the current research. Here at Liverpool we hold fortnightly meetings to discuss recently published papers on a wide range of geomagnetism related subjects from the modern field to the deep past. Anyone can put forward a paper for discussion and whoever is most knowledgeable on the particular subject is invited to give a short review at the start of the meeting, this can be a great opportunity to get an insight into an area of geomagnetism you might not have any previous experience of and give a wider knowledge of the field. These are very informal and also act as a good excuse to all get together, drink tea and eat cake!

As part of this blog we thought we’d give a brief summary of the papers we discuss.This week we looked at a review paper regarding relative palaeointensity and geochronology published in Quaternary Science Reviews.

http://people.rses.anu.edu.au/roberts_a/AR_Publications/152.%20Roberts%20et%20al.%202013.pdf

 Andrew, P.R., Lisa, T. and David, H., Invited review: Magnetic paleointensity stratigraphy and high-resolution Quaternary geochronology: successes and future challenges. Quaternary Science Reviews.

 This interesting review sets out the challenges faced by those using continuous high-resolution relative palaeointensity records to help constrain the chronology of sedimentary sequences, for example as an independent  tool to synchronise different palaeoclimate records. It has been shown that magnetisations acquired in marine and lake sediments can faithfully record variations in the past geomagnetic field. This (post-) depositional remanent magnetisation is produced by detrital magnetic grains that align themselves to the Earth’s magnetic field as they settle through the water column or in the top ‘slushy’ part of the sediment water interface. A lack of understanding of the precise mechanisms involved does make it difficult to isolate a palaeointensity signal and perhaps more importantly assess its reliability. This paper looks into the current research on understanding magnetisation of sediments such as sediment type, diagenesis, flocculation and the effects of salinity and the influence of these on relative paleointensity records.

 Despite not having a definitive theoretical understanding of how sediments record intensity there is compelling evidence to suggest they can be reliable.  There is the global reproducibility of the stacks, the agreement with the production of cosmogenic radionuclides and the records of ocean crust magnetisation from deep-towed magnetometer surveys.

Fig. 3. Comparison of predicted relative paleointensity from the magnetization inverted from a high-resolution marine magnetic anomaly stack (blue; data from Gee et al., 2000) and dipole moments from the PADM2M paleointensity stack (red; Ziegler et al., 2011). Ages for the magnetic anomaly record were rescaled to a common age for the Matuyama–Brunhes boundary (see discussion in the text concerning age offsets of some paleointensity features).

 

 

 

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén